How to effectively conduct the annual HACCP evaluation?
Release Date:
2020-08-07 15:23
Source:
The HACCP plan should be a living document that continuously and accurately reflects the current operations. This ensures that the company's food safety system remains up to date.

1. Why do it?
The purpose of the assessment is to ensure that the HACCP plan is sufficient to control food safety hazards that are reasonably likely to occur.
The FDA's related requirements specify that the assessment must be conducted by personnel who meet the training requirements described in part 123.10. China's GBT 22000, GBT 27341, and the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) have related requirements for enterprises certified by authorized SQF, BRC, FSSC 22000, or IFS.
BRC Issue 8 (2.14.1 HACCP Plan Review): The HACCP food safety team should review the HACCP plan and prerequisite programs that may affect product safety at least once a year and before any changes occur. Appropriate changes resulting from the review should be incorporated into the HACCP plan and/or prerequisite programs, fully documented, and verification recorded.
GBT 22000 (7.7 Corrective Actions for Critical Limit Deviations): When monitoring results of a critical limit repeatedly deviate or the cause of deviation involves the control capability of the corresponding control measures, the HACCP team should reassess the effectiveness and suitability of the related control measures, improve and update them if necessary.
2. When to do it?
The HACCP plan should be evaluated at least once a year, and also whenever changes occur that affect the hazard analysis or HACCP plan.
Including:
1) Change or add new ingredients
2) Modify the formula
3) New equipment
4) New packaging
5) New production process
6) Change in the intended consumer group
3. What to do?
The annual evaluation of the HACCP plan should include a comprehensive review of the food safety system to verify whether the factory's HACCP plan and prerequisite programs comply with the written requirements. An accurate evaluation plan should be prepared in advance, which is a key part of the HACCP system verification process.
Changes to the HACCP system during the year should be recorded on the evaluation worksheet. When recording, it is necessary to assess whether these changes have any impact on product description, flow diagrams, hazard analysis, or the HACCP plan.
Understand new regulatory requirements and changes in scientific literature published in peer-reviewed journals. These changes may affect identified hazards or limits, thereby impacting the determination of critical control points. Therefore, ensure these changes are correctly incorporated into your HACCP plan and supporting documents.
4. How to do it?
Document Review
Review all written HACCP plans, SSOPs, and related prerequisite programs to verify and check accuracy. All records must be reviewed to ensure they meet the plan's requirements.
Carefully read each plan and confirm whether these plans accurately summarize the company's current operations and practices. It is also important to ensure that all created flow diagrams are related to hazard analysis.
The process flow diagram represents the entire production process from receiving raw materials to finished product shipment. Care must be taken not to overlook any part of the process, such as rework, product returns, or auxiliary inputs like water, ice, and air.
On-site Inspection
Factory audits are required to verify strict compliance with the HACCP plan and accurate record-keeping.
When conducting factory audits, be sure to include:
1) Flow diagram verification, i.e., walkthrough of the production process.
2) CCP monitoring review
3) CCP verification requirements
4) Monitoring of critical operational parameters
Record Review
Thoroughly review CCP records, SSOP records, PRP records, and corrective action records. Verify whether the written plans and records comply.
Review all product test results, including microbiological tests, food contact surface tests, and environmental tests, as part of the verification process. These test results demonstrate whether hazards are effectively controlled.
Supporting Documents
Complete all decision documents for CCPs and critical operational parameters. These documents are part of the HACCP plan's supporting documentation.
Decision documents capture the relevant thought processes, including those used to identify hazards, CCPs, and critical or target limits used to maintain control. Relevant scientific or monitoring support documents should also be outlined in the decision documents for verification purposes.
Reassessment Report
Effective HACCP reassessment also requires reviewing documents and preparing an evaluation report, which should include a summary of the process and reassessment of any subsequent changes.
At minimum, it should include an overview of the scientific principles supporting the plan and in-plant verification data. Additionally, completing the reassessment checklist also demonstrates the content of the factory evaluation.
Ensure the verification worksheet summarizes the CCPs, including critical limits and operational parameters, as well as the factory's specific objectives.
5. Who should do it?
The assessment can be completed by internal personnel; however, it is best for the company to have a third party conduct a HACCP plan assessment at an appropriate time. This helps ensure all steps are accurately completed and documented.
Different perspectives may identify important issues. This practice may help the company prevent foodborne illness outbreaks, major recalls, and regulatory non-compliance.
6. Final words
Food companies should conduct HACCP assessments at appropriate times to help effectively self-inspect and improve, preventing catastrophic situations that could cause the entire company to collapse.
Related News
Based on the strategic plan proposed by the headquarters, United Zhiye takes the upgrade of its product system as a key driver to build a three-tiered business structure—comprising “zero-carbon factory solutions + carbon-related products + integrated comprehensive services”—and thereby develop end-to-end service capabilities. The original enterprise’s integrated approach to low-carbon development has been upgraded to an integrated approach to zero-carbon development, which we regard as a milestone event. While the zero-carbon factory business focuses on deepening engagement in the manufacturing sector, the integrated approach to zero-carbon enterprise development transcends industry boundaries, extending its reach to the service sector and thus covering a broader scope of services.
Recently, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology issued the latest revised "Administrative Measures for the Tiered Cultivation of High-Quality Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises" (hereinafter referred to as the "Measures"), which have expanded the scope of cultivation by including technology-based SMEs in the tiered cultivation system for the first time. In the future, the tiered system for high-quality SMEs will encompass technology- and innovation-driven SMEs, specialized, refined, distinctive, and innovative SMEs, and "Little Giant" enterprises that are specialized, refined, distinctive, and innovative. The "Measures" will take effect from April 1, 2026.
Recently, five departments—the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council, and the National Energy Administration—jointly issued the "Guiding Opinions on Promoting the Construction of Zero-Carbon Factories" (MIIT Joint [2026] No. 13, hereinafter referred to as the "Guiding Opinions"). These opinions aim to tap deeply into the potential for energy conservation and carbon reduction in the industrial and information technology sectors, drive carbon reduction and efficiency improvements in key industries, promote a green and low-carbon transformation, and foster the development of new-quality productive forces.
This standardization effort will provide an in-depth interpretation of the new version of the rules and systematically analyze the significant changes and implementation requirements of the new rules in areas such as audit procedures, responsibilities of top management, evidence management, and risk control.
Understand at a Glance | Guangdong Province’s Zero-Carbon Park Development Plan
Recently, the Guangdong Provincial Development and Reform Commission, the Guangdong Provincial Department of Industry and Information Technology, the Guangdong Provincial Department of Ecology and Environment, and the Guangdong Provincial Energy Administration jointly issued the "Guangdong Province Zero-Carbon Park Construction Plan."
Related Downloads
Related News
undefined