Smart Green Integration: Transforming into Reality | Three Directions, One Set of Standards
Release Date:
2026-10-20 08:44
Source:
Recently, at the National Conference on Advanced Manufacturing, General Secretary Xi Jinping issued important instructions on developing advanced manufacturing: “We must adhere to the directions of intelligentization, green development, and integration, continuously strengthen and expand advanced manufacturing, and enhance the autonomy and controllability of industrial chains.” Premier Li Qiang outlined four implementation pathways—“digital and intelligent empowerment, high-end self-reliance, green and low-carbon development, and cross-sectoral integration”—while Vice Premier Zhang Guoqing, in his concluding remarks, identified a key lever: accelerating the establishment of a high-quality standards system and persistently curbing disorderly, irrational competition. Together, these elements—the overarching direction, the specific pathways, and the evaluation criteria—form a coherent logical chain. The true threshold for transformation lies not in the actions themselves, but in the metrics: how to translate the outcomes of transformation into quantifiable evidence that can be independently verified by third parties.
Three main threads, all with verifiable outcomes.
Intelligentization does not equate to equipment automation. According to the “Smart Manufacturing Capability Maturity Model” (GB/T 39116-2020), the maturity level of the entire value chain—encompassing design, production, logistics, sales, and service—must be assessed, rather than relying on the automation rate of a single production line as evidence of advanced capabilities.
Green transformation cannot rely solely on qualitative descriptions. Only when an energy‑consumption baseline, clear accounting boundaries, and traceable data are all in place can the value of energy‑saving upgrades be substantiated.
The prerequisite for integration is the establishment of unified standards. Only when data definitions, carbon‑accounting frameworks, and system architectures are aligned can industrial collaboration truly take root. Without a common benchmark for comparison, transformation efforts risk giving rise to speculative hype—precisely why the conference has repeatedly underscored the importance of a high‑quality standards framework.
A standard is a reliable evaluation framework.
Many enterprises treat standards as technical documents and equate conformity assessment with “obtaining certification.” In reality, a high‑quality standards system delivers threefold value: it defines boundaries, distinguishing genuine transformation from mere conceptual marketing; it ensures consistent measurement, enabling regulators, leading firms in the supply chain, and procurement processes to apply a common yardstick; and it regulates the market, curbing the rampant practice of low‑price, low‑quality products masquerading as advanced manufacturing. Together, standards and conformity assessment essentially transform an enterprise’s internal transformation efforts into evidence that is credible and widely accepted by both government authorities and upstream and downstream stakeholders.
Implementation Leverage: Green Triple Ledger, Intelligent Tiered Development
Green: Establishing three distinct accounting systems. Energy Accounting—clarify energy‑use boundaries, establish an energy‑consumption baseline, implement process‑level metering, and strengthen data integrity through an energy management system and energy‑efficiency diagnostics. Carbon Accounting—conduct organizational greenhouse‑gas verification and product carbon‑footprint assessments, standardize accounting methodologies, and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and supply‑chain acceptance. Factory Accounting—develop green factories, zero‑carbon factories, and industrial parks; maintain a complete audit trail of transformation measures to mitigate challenges in re‑verification and evidence‑gathering.
Smart manufacturing should begin with diagnosis and tiered classification, followed by phased development. It is essential to identify key weaknesses and implement tiered planning and construction, avoiding the trap of blindly rushing toward higher levels. Two benchmark indicators: According to a press release issued by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology in August 2026, the number of national green factories has reached 8,336, with their output value accounting for 22% of the total output value of large-scale manufacturing—up from 9%—and aiming to reach 45% by the end of the 15th Five-Year Plan period. Meanwhile, smart factories have established a four-tiered development framework, encompassing basic, advanced, excellent, and leading levels.
Leave the “clear explanation” to us.
Beijing United Zhiye Certification Co., Ltd.
Disclaimer: This article is compiled based on publicly available conference information and policy documents. Industry statistics cited herein are subject to the official press releases; for the specific implementation of related initiatives, please refer to the formally issued documents of the competent authorities. 。
Related News
Peaking carbon emissions has moved from the stage of “setting targets” to the stage of “accountability.”
The “hidden waste” uncovered during audits—your workshop may have it too.
Photovoltaic glass is a quintessential energy-intensive industry: batching, melting, annealing, tempering, and coating—each process consumes substantial amounts of energy. During the recertification audit of an energy management system, a certain photovoltaic glass company underwent a transformation—from “nonconformity” to tangible financial benefits. The audit was conducted by a specialized team from United Zhiye Certification Co., Ltd.
Smart Green Integration: Transforming into Reality | Three Directions, One Set of Standards
Recently, at the National Conference on Advanced Manufacturing, General Secretary Xi Jinping issued important instructions on developing advanced manufacturing: “We must adhere to the directions of intelligentization, green development, and integration, continuously strengthen and expand advanced manufacturing, and enhance the autonomy and controllability of industrial chains.” Premier Li Qiang outlined four implementation pathways—“digital and intelligent empowerment, high-end self-reliance, green and low-carbon development, and cross-sectoral integration”—while Vice Premier Zhang Guoqing, in his concluding remarks, identified a key lever: accelerating the establishment of a high-quality standards system and persistently curbing disorderly and irrational competition. Together, these elements—the overarching direction, the specific pathways, and the evaluation criteria—form a coherent and comprehensive logical framework.
Recently, the State Council Information Office held a press conference on the theme of “Getting Off to a Good Start in the 15th Five-Year Plan.” The State Administration for Market Regulation clarified that metrology, standardization, certification and accreditation, and inspection and testing together constitute the national quality infrastructure. In response to “involutionary” low‑price competition, it will adopt a comprehensive approach, leveraging standard‑setting guidance, quality supervision, and price‑enforcement measures to rectify and steer market behavior.
On October 9, the CPC Central Committee and the State Council issued the “Opinions on Developing New‑Type Productive Forces” (hereinafter referred to as the “Opinions”). Supporting high‑quality development and fostering new‑type productive forces have always been the core priorities of the certification, accreditation, inspection, and testing sectors. The “Opinions” contain numerous provisions addressing the establishment of a certification system and the improvement of the standards framework.
Related Downloads
Related News
undefined