Ten Common Nonconformities in Quality Management System Audits

Release Date:

2022-01-05 13:52

Source:

1. Design and Development

Customer special requirements were not identified or implemented
Special characteristics (including product and process) were not identified and controlled

DFMEA or PFMEA did not consider potential or occurred failures

Symbols for special characteristics were not identified in process documents

Lack of linkage between PFMEA and control plan

Unable to prove PFMEA and control plan are dynamic documents

Top management did not participate in stage reviews

Process capability was not evaluated for new processes

Incorrect scoring of "S", "O", and "D" in PFMEA

Some performance test conditions do not meet customer requirements

2. General Requirements for Quality Management System / Quality Manual

Processes in the quality management system were not identified

Sequence and interaction of processes were not specified in the quality manual

Performance indicators for identified processes were not specified

Process performance indicators were not monitored

Lack of linkage between process performance indicators and quality objectives

3. Management Review

Top management did not participate in management review

Processes within the organization were not identified

No process performance indicators were established or used as inputs for management review

Customer special requirements were not considered

Improvements to the system, products, and resources were not considered

Improvement measures were not monitored

Inputs did not cover the requirements of the standard

4. Purchasing / Product Approval Process

Special characteristics related to raw materials and parts were not communicated to suppliers

Requirements for supplier production approval process were not specified or implemented

Selected suppliers were not approved, or re-approval was not conducted after supplier changes such as relocation

Supplier quality system development was not conducted

Supplier delivery performance was not monitored, and extra freight was not monitored

Acceptance criteria for products were not agreed upon with suppliers

5. Control of Production and Service Provision

Operation preparation was not verified

Control methods specified in the control plan were inconsistent with those in the work instructions and were not implemented in actual production

Production planning was not order-driven and its completion was not monitored

Process parameters specified in work instructions were not monitored as required

Process capability monitoring for special characteristics indicated in process control documents was not conducted

Abnormal conditions in statistical control charts were not analyzed

Inspections of products during production processes did not meet product requirements

No measures were taken when production processes were unstable or process capability was insufficient

6. Identification and Traceability

Products stored within organizational processes were not identified

Inspection and test status were not included in identification

Traceability of produced products, especially safety-related, was not achievable

Time requirements were not identified during production cycles for products or raw materials with storage period requirements

Nonconforming or expired products were not identified in a timely manner

7. Control of Monitoring and Measuring Devices

Calibration records meeting requirements were not provided

Test software was not calibrated

Allowable criteria for monitoring and measuring equipment were not established based on product requirements

Calibration results could not be traced to international and national standards

No internal calibration records for internal calibration

Internal calibration specifications were not established, and standard instruments were not reflected in internal calibration records

Limit samples were not regularly verified

Measurement system analysis was not conducted for measurement systems specified in the control plan

External metrology organizations used were not accredited laboratories

8. Competence, Awareness, and Training

Job competency requirements were not determined

Training plans were not developed based on training needs

Personnel involved in product quality could not prove competence

Training plans did not consider all employees, including temporary and transferred employees

No methods were established to measure employee awareness

Employee safety and injury risks during production

9. Control of Nonconforming Products / Corrective / Preventive Actions

Nonconforming products were not isolated in a timely manner

Concession acceptance of nonconforming products was not approved by customers or internally

Priority reduction plans for nonconformities related to customer concerns or key organizational issues were not developed

Cause analysis was not conducted for corrective actions on nonconformities

Corrective actions were not feasible

Effectiveness of corrective actions was not verified

Causes of nonconformities and corrective actions were not fed back to FMEA, nor considered for similar products

Preventive and mistake-proofing methods were not considered

10. Continuous Improvement

Confusion with the concept of corrective actions

No analysis of the current situation, nor formulation of new objectives

No consideration of continuous improvement from the perspective of the organization's overall quality management system or manufacturing process

What documents are required for a company to apply for after-sales service certification?

The United Intelligence Industry Ecological Environment Professional Committee Successfully Held the New Year's Reception

The national zero-carbon factory policy is now in effect! United Zhiye provides precise support to help clients seize the initiative in their transformation.

Based on the strategic plan proposed by the headquarters, United Zhiye takes the upgrade of its product system as a key driver to build a three-tiered business structure—comprising “zero-carbon factory solutions + carbon-related products + integrated comprehensive services”—and thereby develop end-to-end service capabilities. The original enterprise’s integrated approach to low-carbon development has been upgraded to an integrated approach to zero-carbon development, which we regard as a milestone event. While the zero-carbon factory business focuses on deepening engagement in the manufacturing sector, the integrated approach to zero-carbon enterprise development transcends industry boundaries, extending its reach to the service sector and thus covering a broader scope of services.

For the first time, technology-based small and medium-sized enterprises have been included in the scope of tiered cultivation for high-quality SMEs.

Recently, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology issued the latest revised "Administrative Measures for the Tiered Cultivation of High-Quality Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises" (hereinafter referred to as the "Measures"), which have expanded the scope of cultivation by including technology-based SMEs in the tiered cultivation system for the first time. In the future, the tiered system for high-quality SMEs will encompass technology- and innovation-driven SMEs, specialized, refined, distinctive, and innovative SMEs, and "Little Giant" enterprises that are specialized, refined, distinctive, and innovative. The "Measures" will take effect from April 1, 2026.

Five departments jointly issued the "Guiding Opinions on Carrying Out the Construction of Zero-Carbon Factories."

Recently, five departments—the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council, and the National Energy Administration—jointly issued the "Guiding Opinions on Promoting the Construction of Zero-Carbon Factories" (MIIT Joint [2026] No. 13, hereinafter referred to as the "Guiding Opinions"). These opinions aim to tap deeply into the potential for energy conservation and carbon reduction in the industrial and information technology sectors, drive carbon reduction and efficiency improvements in key industries, promote a green and low-carbon transformation, and foster the development of new-quality productive forces.

Notice on Certification Risk Management and Standard Implementation Services | Top Management of Certified Organizations Must Complete Training on the New Version of Quality Management System Certification Rules

This standardization effort will provide an in-depth interpretation of the new version of the rules and systematically analyze the significant changes and implementation requirements of the new rules in areas such as audit procedures, responsibilities of top management, evidence management, and risk control.

Understand at a Glance | Guangdong Province’s Zero-Carbon Park Development Plan

Recently, the Guangdong Provincial Development and Reform Commission, the Guangdong Provincial Department of Industry and Information Technology, the Guangdong Provincial Department of Ecology and Environment, and the Guangdong Provincial Energy Administration jointly issued the "Guangdong Province Zero-Carbon Park Construction Plan."

Related Downloads